Jump to content

Please read the Forum Rules before posting.

Photo

Comparing KJV+ with HOT+ in Psalms


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 dan ramsey

dan ramsey

    e-Sword Supporter

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Location13104
Offline

Posted 20 November 2020 - 10:02 PM

Comparing KJV+ with HOT+ in Psalms where the first verse is included with Psalm notes in the KJV+ but not in the HOT+ causes several Psalms to compare with mismatched verses.  What can be done to make them match.

 

I apologize for asking for more.  I have tried to build my own module, but I cannot get it to keep its color or even get Hebrew scripture accepted into the compare feature.  Then KJV+ and the NASB+ are beautiful and so is the HOT+ and they match pretty much everywhere except in the Psalms and a few verses in the prophets.

 

Sincerely, looking for any solution,

 

Dan Ramsey

 


dan ramsey

#2 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
Offline

Posted 21 November 2020 - 05:45 AM

HOT+ use the KJV verse numbering and the Hebrew verse numbering in blue but the updated "Hebrew OT+" use the Hebrew verse numbering only.

HOT+ is not longer downloadable except if you have the Install of e-Sword 9 then is it in the default.

HOT+ is an old BBLX module is not compatible with parallel mode in newer editions of e-Sword.

 

Normally should you convert them (HOT and HOT+) to Apple modules but those modules are locked by Rick Meyers.

So you need to recreate the HOT+ module and make it HTM compatible for yourself only.

OR better ask it to Rick Meyers to "update HOT+ for e-Sword 12 because HOT+  use both verse numbering methods and is easier to compare with the KJV and most other Bibles unlike "Hebrew OT+ that only use the "Hebrew verse numbering".

 

I made unpointed Hebrew text-only versions (and added blue verse numbering) for myself based on the Hebrew Study Bible and the one for Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, Fifth Revised Edition in italics and [ ]

Editing of Hebrew is not so easy as Greek and English because of the Hebrew use right to left script while the blue use left to right script.

The best HTM tag for blue is <blu></blu>  and for Strong is <num></num> in e-Sword 12. I used SQLbrowser for this.

 blu is in "1974 verses found, 3956 matches" in my unpointed edition of the Hebrew Study Bible 4. So that was edited in every verse.

But I need to make two editions again WITH the Strong's numbers. So it need to restart it again. <_<

The reason to make extra unpointed versions was to make a collation of textual variants for my translation and as knowledge.

But I canceled it a time ago because of the work between RHB10 and RHB11 that deal with many other stuff.

 

The Hebrew Study Bible and the Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, Fifth Revised Edition are not the same as HOT+ because of the Ketiv and Qere, the parashah, the textual variants

and the other Strong's numbers based on interpretation (the Originals were without vowel points: and are dubious in interpretation).

HOT+ Strong's follow closer the KJV interpretation than the Hebrew Study Bible and Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, Fifth Revised Edition.


Edited by Katoog, 21 November 2020 - 06:17 AM.

Restored Holy Bible 11 and the Restored Textus Receptus

http://rhb.altervista.org/homepage.htm


#3 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
Offline

Posted 21 November 2020 - 06:01 AM

 

Then KJV+ and the NASB+ are beautiful and so is the HOT+ and they match pretty much everywhere except in the Psalms and a few verses in the prophets.

 

"and a few verses in the prophets"? There is much more to edit than only a few verses outside Psalms

There is the text only Hebrew Study Bible without accents that I edited.

Type blu in  "Search for all words" to show how many verses that you need to edit.
Keep in your mind that this is not HOT.

 

Attached Files


Restored Holy Bible 11 and the Restored Textus Receptus

http://rhb.altervista.org/homepage.htm


#4 dan ramsey

dan ramsey

    e-Sword Supporter

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Location13104
Offline

Posted 21 November 2020 - 08:12 AM

Thank you for your reply.  Forgive my ignorance but I am not understanding SQL browser or blue HTM tags for compatibility.  I have an unpointed Hebrew text for both the old and  new testaments that matches the King James translation verses pretty well.  Will adapting the blue tags make Hebrew text work in the compare window?


Edited by dan ramsey, 21 November 2020 - 08:35 AM.

dan ramsey

#5 dan ramsey

dan ramsey

    e-Sword Supporter

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Location13104
Offline

Posted 21 November 2020 - 08:34 AM

I see hsb4wa works in the compare window and I see how the blue verse references make the text agree with the kjv verses.  So what makes one Hebrew file compatible and another not?  and how is your file so small?


dan ramsey

#6 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
Offline

Posted 21 November 2020 - 10:42 AM

The version number for BBLX is 2 and  the version 4 for BBLI

You need version 4 for apple and e-Sword 11&12

 

I did it. I found an easy way to update the HOT+ file. I made missing "H" corrections and smaller the space  between the heb and num tags .

 

Here is HOT+ for Apple and e-Sword 11&12 and it is compatible with parallel mode and is searchable.

You don't need the old HOT+ file anymore.

The 000__ is to place the module on the first place.

 

Attached Files


Edited by Katoog, 22 November 2020 - 09:44 AM.

Restored Holy Bible 11 and the Restored Textus Receptus

http://rhb.altervista.org/homepage.htm


#7 dan ramsey

dan ramsey

    e-Sword Supporter

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts
  • Location13104
Offline

Posted 21 November 2020 - 11:07 AM

Thank you, that looks good.


dan ramsey

#8 JPG

JPG

    Bug Hunter

  • Moderators
  • 1,076 posts
Online

Posted 22 November 2020 - 07:31 AM

The version number for BBLX is 2 and  the version 4 for BBLI

You need version 4 for apple and e-Sword 11&12

 

I did it. I found an easy way to update the HOT+ file. I made missing "H" corrections and smaller the space  between the heb and num tags .

 

Here is HOT+ for Apple and e-Sword 11&12 and it is compatible with parallel mode and is searchable.

You don't need the old HOT+ file anymore.

The 000__ is to place the module on the first place.

I think you need to set Strongs value to True for the popup to work on the PC.



#9 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,027 posts
Offline

Posted 22 November 2020 - 09:45 AM

I think you need to set Strongs value to True for the popup to work on the PC.

Yes, it is now fixed


Restored Holy Bible 11 and the Restored Textus Receptus

http://rhb.altervista.org/homepage.htm





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Similar Topics



Latest Blogs