Submitter
Follow @BibleSupportSUPPORT TOPIC File Information
- Submitted: Aug 09 2011 04:18 PM
- Last Updated: Jun 19 2025 03:29 PM
- File Size: 1.48MB
- Views: 3335
- Downloads: 398
- Author: Williams, William A.
- e-Sword Version: 9.x - 10.x
Support BibleSupport.com
-
If our e-Sword and MySword modules have blessed you, please consider a small donation.
Your donation pays only for dedicated server hosting, bandwidth, software licenses, and capital equipment (scanners, OCR equipment, etc).
Other Modules By Same Author
- No modules found
e-Sword 9+ Module Download:
Download
Williams, William A. - The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved - DrDave version 1.0
1 Votes
Author:
Williams, William A.
e-Sword Version:
9.x - 10.x
The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved - DrDave version
by William A. Williams
Table of Contents
00.5 -- Introduction
00.6 -- Theories of Evolution
01 -- PART ONE: Evolution of the Human Body
The Unity of the Human Race
1. The Population of the World
2. The Unity of Languages
3. Religions
4. Place of the Origin of Man
5. Civilizations
6. The Mendelian Inheritance Law
7. Biometry
8. No New Species Now
9. Mathematical Probability
10. The Age of the Earth
11. Geology and History
12. Geographical Distribution
13. God Not Absent Nor Inactive
14. Chance or Design?
15. Evolution Atheistic
16. Brute Descent Impossible
17. Eight Impassable Gulfs
18. Ancestral Apes and Monkeys
19. A Staggering Speculation
20. Sex
21. Man Hairless and Tailless
22. Hybrids
23. The Instinct of Animals
24. Special Creation: Gen. I
25. Analogy; Mathematics, Laws
26. Desperate Arguements
27. Twenty Objections Admitted
28. Scientists Condemn Evolution
02 -- PART TWO: Evidence Answered
29. Paleontology
30. Confessed Collapse of Proof
31. Pictures in Caverns
32. Vestigial Organs
33. Serology, or Blood Tests
34. Embryology
03 -- PART THREE: The Soul
35. The Origin of the Soul
36. Personality
37. Intellect, Emotions and Will
38. Abstract Reason
39. Conscience
40. Spirituality
41. The Hope of Immortality
42. Sin
43. Redemption
44. Evolution Aids Infidelity and Atheism
45. Evolution Wars With Christianity
46. Camouflage of Terms
47. What Are We to Believe?
48. What Can We Do?
49. Problems for Review
50. The Supremacy of Jesus
04 -- Song: Christ Is All
Summary of The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved by William A. Williams
William A. Williams’s The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved is a critical examination of the theory of human evolution as presented by mainstream science. Published in the early 20th century, the book challenges the prevailing ideas that humans evolved from lower primates through natural selection and common ancestry.
Williams begins by questioning the scientific basis of evolutionary theory, arguing that the evidence supporting human evolution is circumstantial, often misinterpreted, or outright flawed. He scrutinizes the fossil record, claiming that the supposed transitional forms between apes and humans are either nonexistent or insufficient to establish a direct evolutionary link. For example, Williams critiques the famous fossils like Piltdown Man, which was later proven to be a hoax, and he dismisses the significance of other alleged transitional fossils by pointing out inconsistencies and lack of clear evolutionary progression.
The author also addresses the genetic and anatomical arguments used to support evolution. He contends that similarities in physical features between humans and apes can be explained through common design rather than common descent. Williams emphasizes the complexity of human anatomy and physiology, asserting that such intricacies could not have arisen through random mutations and natural selection alone. He argues that the design and purpose evident in human organs and systems point toward an intelligent Creator rather than an evolutionary process.
Williams dedicates considerable space to critiquing the molecular and genetic evidence. He suggests that the genetic differences between humans and other primates are too significant to be reconciled with the idea of gradual evolution. Moreover, he questions the reliability of dating methods, such as radioactive dating, which are often used to establish the age of fossils, asserting that these methods are flawed or manipulated to fit evolutionary narratives.
The book also examines cultural and archaeological evidence, challenging the assumption that artifacts and ancient remains prove human evolution. Williams interprets ancient artifacts and structures as evidence of a divine creation rather than evidence of a primitive past. He dismisses the notion that early humans gradually developed civilizations, instead proposing that human intelligence and culture were created by an intelligent Designer.
Throughout the book, Williams advocates for a literal interpretation of the Biblical account of creation, asserting that the biblical record provides a more accurate and scientifically valid explanation of human origins. He criticizes the scientific community for what he perceives as a bias toward materialism and atheism, which he believes has led to the rejection of divine creation in favor of evolution.
In conclusion, The Evolution of Man Scientifically Disproved presents a comprehensive critique of evolutionary science from a creationist perspective. Williams advocates for a re-examination of the evidence and calls for recognition of divine creation as the true origin of mankind. While his views are controversial and widely rejected by the scientific community, the book remains a significant work within creationist literature, emphasizing faith-based interpretations over mainstream scientific consensus.
What's New in Version 1.0 (See full changelog)
- 06/19/25 Added Summary to Description, Uploaded refi module file
Other files you may be interested in ..
- 8,326 Total Files
- 52 Total Categories
- 295 Total Contributors
- 6,384,495 Total Downloads
- Son Of Man Bible Latest File
- anapto Latest Submitter
user(s) are online (in the past 30 minutes)
members, guests, anonymous users














Taking advantage of peoples scientific illiteracy is not a good way to win hearts and minds. It's not necessary to sink to this level of sophistry and outright dishonesty to assert God the Creator of life.
In fact, how are we to deny God being the architect of DNA then letting nature run its course til achieving its perfection in the advent of Man? (Hate to burst your bubbles, but, we're still evolving toward that perfection envisioned for us from God.)
The simple fact is, we humans cannot know all things as God knows them. We can only delve into those mysteries He's given and try to understand on ever-deeper levels.
Let's not let dogma blind us in the true quest for knowledge of God's creation and of God's Own Divine Nature as manifesting before our eyes and within our souls.