I think you may have misunderstood the post. I never accused anyone here at this site of low resolution map content, and perhaps that part was ambiguous when I posted. The post is rather honest and addresses a potential deficiency across app map module content; to confirm, I am asking if others may or may not agree. This is an essential part of good software development processes - to confirm/detail deficiencies and explore possible fix-actions. This is a discussion forum, and as such, with others who have much more experience in this particular app.

 

Prior to posting here, I had *already* posted my review of the particular e-sword module. I do not want to specify which one here because its not beneficial after I researched around and saw maybe a pattern?.?.

 

However, thanks in advance for your very hard work! Any effort bringing others to the glory of God is doing God's good work.

I have to say thanks for the developers for their contributions. That being said, the map modules across the board for e-sword are disappointing. The evidence is in the severe lack of resolution when expanding maps. In fact, just look at the reviews for consistent feedback about this. Folks with accessibility issues reading small print, etc. are left out. Zooming in on map content that they paid money for, as an example, should not be given scanned low resolution maps that fuzz when researching scripture. Free is free, but paid content deserves to be at a higher bar. Am I alone by expecting more than low resolution map content for an excellent application such as e-sword? Have a great day!