Jump to content

Please read the Forum Rules before posting.

Photo
- - - - -

tooltip help with goto


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 gad4

gad4

    Liking e-Sword

  • Veterans
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts
Offline

Posted 17 February 2019 - 08:30 PM

While trying to make a dictionary, many strong's number refer to the same definition.

 

What i want to do is when ÷H10003 appears, it forwards automatically into a separate definition. What is the correct way to do it?

 

I would like to automate the this by pasting into the document for each entry (likely with a find/replace command) so the actual text that needs to be in the document is appreciated.

 

Thanks

 

 

 

 



#2 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 897 posts
Offline

Posted 17 February 2019 - 11:59 PM

While trying to make a dictionary, many strong's number refer to the same definition.

 

What i want to do is when ÷H10003 appears, it forwards automatically into a separate definition. What is the correct way to do it?

 

I would like to automate the this by pasting into the document for each entry (likely with a find/replace command) so the actual text that needs to be in the document is appreciated.

 

Thanks

I'm not a dictionary maker but no Strong's number has more than 4 digits so it is rather ÷H1003

 

Page 62 and 63

http://www.biblesupp...vision-1052013/


Edited by Katoog, 18 February 2019 - 12:11 AM.

Restored Holy Bible(9.0) and the Restored Textus Receptus

http://rhb.altervista.org/homepage.htm


#3 gad4

gad4

    Liking e-Sword

  • Veterans
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts
Offline

Posted 21 February 2019 - 11:17 PM

Thanks for the response.  currently trying a different way but open to getting this to work.

 

Unfortunately, I have to link/anchor another matrix and H strongs numbers go very high so its hard to add more without an extra digit. open to this strategy however if it works best.



#4 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 897 posts
Offline

Posted 22 February 2019 - 12:35 AM

By the H strong's numbers are the H8675 until H9999 free to fill a dictionary.

 

Niobi aka Patchworkid's Study Bible Dictionary (Teachings) linked with his commentary used an extra digit in his Dictionary.

But I don't recommend the method because it is possible that an update of e-Sword shall limit digits to 4 in the dictionaries for optimization reasons.

 

 


Restored Holy Bible(9.0) and the Restored Textus Receptus

http://rhb.altervista.org/homepage.htm


#5 RevSteve

RevSteve

    Liking e-Sword

  • Veterans
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts
Offline

Posted 22 February 2019 - 12:49 AM

Wonder if the program only recognizes numbers? If it would recognize letters, that could keep number of digits down. I haven't tried that yet...someone who knows would save me from having to try it. I have mostly moved away from using strongs numbering due to its limiting factor.

#6 gad4

gad4

    Liking e-Sword

  • Veterans
  • PipPip
  • 28 posts
Offline

Posted 22 February 2019 - 12:04 PM

Thanks for the thoughts.
Im a mysword user so what ever is created would have to be formatted back to mysword




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Similar Topics



Latest Blogs