Jump to content

Please read the Forum Rules before posting.

Photo
- - - - -

Concordant Concern Print Version 2012


3 replies to this topic

#1 robby.morales

robby.morales

    New to Bible Support

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
Offline

Posted 15 September 2016 - 08:08 PM

Does anyone know why the 2012 print version of CLV is different than the ESWORD 2003 electronic version. EX: Gen 1:27 And creating is the Elohim humanity in His image. (e-sword version) | +So Elohim |created `.humanity in His image; (2012 Print Version)

 

Please help.....thank you.



#2 APsit190

APsit190

    e-Sword Tools Developer

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,871 posts
  • LocationLand of the Long White Cloud (AKA New Zealand)
Online

Posted 16 September 2016 - 04:08 PM

Ummm, I think you missed the most obvious answer, which is: They are totally two different Editions, that's why. The hard copy you have is a 2012 Edition, which by an large would have changed from the 2003 edition that e-Sword has.

 

It is the same with any other translation of the Bible when new editions have come on the scene, e.g., NIV 1988 edition and the NIV 2011, and you will notice the same sort of thing. So, with that, its really no biggy except when changes in the new editions are really bad. But this is not the forum to go into that kind of thing.

 

Blessings,

Autograph.png

X (formerly Twitter)

 


#3 JPG

JPG

    Jon.

  • Moderators
  • 1,678 posts
Offline

Posted 17 September 2016 - 01:13 AM

 
Try the module from this official site. http://concordant.org/study-tools/
There is a download for e-Sword there. I suggest you remove the other version you have installed because of a tab name conflict that will exist with the one you have installed already.
 

It contains markings in the text that are explained in the info of the module. This data is not present in the CLV (version) from biblesupport.com and so misses its purpose.

 

Jon



#4 robby.morales

robby.morales

    New to Bible Support

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 2 posts
Offline

Posted 19 September 2016 - 08:46 AM

Thank you gents. It is as I suspected. Bad update to an otherwise excellent version. Thanks again.





Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Similar Topics



Latest Blogs