I forgot to add that I haven't seen much activity on this site or the Word Modules site in the last couple of months so was hoping to encourage some to keep the sites going. Its just great!
I intend to run this as long as e-Sword exists. That's because thousands of new people download e-Sword every day and some seek modules not available within e-Sword. Almost every day, I get emails from people who just found this website. It's a new experience for them.
But for new modules, what's left to do? For example, what worthwhile commentary sets are left that we can legally publish? "Worthwhile" is based on your theological perspective (i.e what interests you). I think from a protestant, evangelical perspective, we have in e-Sword format most of what's worth doing. I mention protestant and evangelical because that's a lot of this website's user base. The evidence that the user base is largely satisfied is the drastic reduction of the "module requests" threads. We saw a whole lot more in 2012 than we do in 2015--because we've met that demand. (Instead of someone saying, "Can you make Ellicott's Commentary", they go download Ellicott's Commentary.)
For me (and most module makers), I create modules based on A) text being readily available (scanned and proofed) and it's in my theological ballpark or B) do I like it enough to digitize it (quality: how does it compare with what already exists). This is balanced with how much time it would take.
I've run short on A and B. That doesn't mean there's nothing left to do. It just means that there's fewer titles to choose from that the module maker finds interesting; the easy, already digitized text available on the Internet has been exhausted; and I have to weigh the quality of the resource with the time required to produce it.
A good example of the tension between the quality of a resource and the time required to produce it is the current project James Rice and I are working on. It's a good set written by a solid author. The author preached on the Bible for a year and the set is the result.
But is it as good as the Preacher's Homiletical Commentary? Or the Sermon Bible? Not a chance because it's a fraction of that size, and it's no where near as exhaustive. Yet, the time still has to be spent to digitize the set--a set that is good, but not as great as what's already available.
You might call these second tier and third tier resources. I have a few commentary sets that fit into this category on my project list.
I also have a copyrighted commentary that I have permission to use. I'm going to start on it after the Riley project and it will go very quickly. That's an easy decision because I find the content compelling and it's already digitized!