Jump to content

Please read the Forum Rules before posting.

Photo
- - - - -

Resource/Module Reviews


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 APsit190

APsit190

    e-Sword Tools Developer

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,869 posts
  • LocationLand of the Long White Cloud (AKA New Zealand)
Online

Posted 08 July 2014 - 09:58 PM

At every download page, as well as the information of a resource, there is a space right down at the bottom of the page where one can write a review. usually one writes problems and issues about the module, and others give kudos type comments to the person for that resource. Vary rarely does one actually see or read an actual review of it, and therefore there is a lot of thought and information that could be quite helpful that goes missing  because of it.

 

Critiquing works as part of a review gives a user valued information about it. And the kind of information that is placed in the review will determine the value of that particular resource. Where things are good, bad, or questionable placed in the review helps in determining what needs to be looked out for when using a particular resource, and its information like that which really needs to be put out.

 

So, with that in mind, if you place a comment in the Review window, and give thumbs up on it, write a small review on that resource telling us why you think like that. You may be the person who can really make that resource really worthwhile for others to download.

 

Blessings,

Autograph.png

 


X (formerly Twitter)

 


#2 Katoog

Katoog

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,287 posts
Offline

Posted 09 July 2014 - 05:19 AM

 

Critiquing works as part of a review gives a user valued information about it. And the kind of information that is placed in the review will determine the value of that particular resource. Where things are good, bad, or questionable placed in the review helps in determining what needs to be looked out for when using a particular resource, and its information like that which really needs to be put out.

 

If you make a "review" then be clear why it is good or bad. And not just “I don't trust the writer because he/she is from another Church” and down-rate the module for one typo.
If there are typos then can you PM the module-maker.

 

http://library.queen...views/how-write


Restored Holy Bible 17 and the Restored Textus Receptus

https://rhb.altervis...rg/homepage.htm


#3 APsit190

APsit190

    e-Sword Tools Developer

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,869 posts
  • LocationLand of the Long White Cloud (AKA New Zealand)
Online

Posted 10 July 2014 - 07:06 PM

If you make a "review" then be clear why it is good or bad. And not just “I don't trust the writer because he/she is from another Church” and down-rate the module for one typo.
If there are typos then can you PM the module-maker.

 

http://library.queen...views/how-write

 

You have added very valid points here, and appreciate them very much.

 

And just to add to this, where you do disagree, you need to give valid reason to why you disagree, and in where you see a Biblical type error, you need to state what the error is, and the reason for why think/believe it is erroneous.

 

One of the best reviews I've come across is by Daryl Wingerd about the book, Wild At Heart by John Eldredge. This review is a very much in depth which covers just about the whole book. The review is 11 A4 Pages in length, which really does goes into a great deal of depth of this book. That said, I don't think we really need to read reviews of such length and depth here, but it would be great to see something that wants to make me either want to download and as to how helpful it might be.

 

Daryl Wingerd's review was a critical review, of which he pointed out many errors in John Eldredge's thinking and beliefs regarding the Scriptures. And although there may be works here that are of that nature, I think the depth of a review of a particular work like that needn't go into such depth.

 

Blessings,

Autograph.png

X (formerly Twitter)

 


#4 DSaw

DSaw

    Resource Builder

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,159 posts
  • LocationEast Coast
Offline

Posted 10 July 2014 - 07:42 PM

Josh naturally has the last say in this but what you are presenting may violate 4. of forum rules

 

 

4. Do not debate doctrinal issues except in the Theology Discussion Forums. The support forums are for e-Sword and MySword users to learn more about e-Sword and Mysword—it is not here to discuss doctrinal persuasions. You can ask about a resource's doctrine if you need assistance. You can ask what resources discuss a doctrinal viewpoint. You cannot debate or discuss the perceived accuracy of any given doctrinal viewpont. Please discuss them in Theology Discussion Forums. The moderators solely reserve the right to make necessary doctrinally related comments in the support forums.


May God change our hearts to what the truth is

2Ti_2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.

Rom_9:16 So then it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy.

2Ti 2:24-25  And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth; 
 

 

 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Similar Topics



Latest Blogs