Jump to content

Please read the Forum Rules before posting.

Photo
- - - - -

JFB - Un abridged commentary down for review - Complete & Uploaded


  • Please log in to reply
36 replies to this topic

#1 david psalms

david psalms

    Resource Builder

  • Moderators
  • 976 posts
  • LocationAndhra Pradesh, India
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 12:09 AM

Hi All,

 

Sorry for the trouble. in few verse references some of the text was mis placed. i have brought down the file to verify one more time. i will correct the errors and re upload again. all the downloaders please accept my apology. please re download the module when it is up again.

 

thanks

david


The first goal in life is to make ourselves acceptable to the LORD


#2 JPG

JPG

    Bug Hunter

  • Moderators
  • 961 posts
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 12:25 AM

Another very minor typo I see is 1:e I think it should be &c.

 

Jon



#3 Josh Bond

Josh Bond

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,882 posts
  • LocationGallatin, TN
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 09:44 AM

Or i.e. ?



#4 david psalms

david psalms

    Resource Builder

  • Moderators
  • 976 posts
  • LocationAndhra Pradesh, India
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 10:00 AM

this problem might have come as i ran the option of converting roman nos to normal numbers in tooltip.


The first goal in life is to make ourselves acceptable to the LORD


#5 Josh Bond

Josh Bond

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,882 posts
  • LocationGallatin, TN
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 10:16 AM

I have developed (and still tweaking) a MS-Word macro that is a little smarter than T4's roman numeral algorithm. I needed it for some OCR projects where roman numeral verses are used. You want Luke i. 5 converted to Luke 1:5 but not i.e. converted to 1:e. And you want chap iv. converted to chapter 4 not chapter 4: with a colon after it because there is no verse. And you need iv.-x. converted to 4-10 not "4:-x", which is how T4 converts it.

 

When I get it done, I'll share it, if it's reliable enough



#6 JPG

JPG

    Bug Hunter

  • Moderators
  • 961 posts
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 10:26 AM

Or i.e. ?

 

I did wonder if it was i.e. but etc, or the old version of it &c. makes more sense and is what is used here 

http://www.ccel.org/...fb.xi.v.vi.html

 

Would you agree?



#7 DoctorDaveT

DoctorDaveT

    e-Sword Fanatic

  • Members (T)
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 385 posts
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 10:45 AM

When I get it done, I'll share it, if it's reliable enough

 

Is your work something BH. could implement into T4?


Dave
visit www.DoctorDaveT.com for eSword modules, software tips, & more


#8 Josh Bond

Josh Bond

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,882 posts
  • LocationGallatin, TN
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 11:01 AM

I did wonder if it was i.e. but etc, or the old version of it &c. makes more sense and is what is used here 

http://www.ccel.org/...fb.xi.v.vi.html

 

Would you agree?

 

The HTML he was working from had i.e. Probably converted from &c by whoever digitized it. And then T4 made i.e. into 1:e.

 

 

Is your work something BH. could implement into T4?

 

Brent would have to code this himself into T4. He knows about it but is tied up with other things at the moment. 



#9 JPG

JPG

    Bug Hunter

  • Moderators
  • 961 posts
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 11:52 AM

The HTML he was working from had i.e. Probably converted from &c by whoever digitized it. And then T4 made i.e. into 1:e.

 

 

David,

 

A small point I know, but the book has &c. http://archive.org/s...age/n7/mode/2up

 

&c. is archaic abbreviation of etc. not i.e. http://en.wikipedia....n_abbreviations

 

Agree? Why repeat someones Oops?

 

Jon



#10 Arnie51

Arnie51

    Liking e-Sword

  • Veterans
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts
Offline

Posted 03 September 2013 - 02:43 PM

This commentary has disappeared off the download list - is there a problem with it?






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users




Similar Topics



Latest Blogs