I still use e-Sword V. 9 because of missing features and sometimes unpredictable results with the new editor controls. For example:
- It's no longer possible to make "hanging" bullets the default setting in all editor windows, but rather each new paragraph has to be reset to "hanging" bullets by hand. "Hanging" bullets are default in every text editor I know, so I don't understand why it can't be incorporated in e-Sword. (Even this line I just typed here is a "hanging" bullet by default.)
- Trying to change the default indentations in the format paragraph dialogue box causes very unpredictable results. It seems like any indentations other than 0.5" are simply ignored. Trying to combine first line indentations and second line indentations to achieve the "hanging" bullet format usually results in something very different than the values that were entered or no indentations at all.
- If a bullet has been formatted by hand so the second line is also indented ("hanging"), then trying to indent such lines to a second or third level to achieve an outline format is very difficult and usually undoes the previous formatting. In V. 9 this can be done with one simple click to the "indent" icon to very easily create a mult-level outline format. In V. 10 it's either not possible or very labor intensive.
I've used the above formats in my topic and study notes for years and prefer to keep future notes in the same format. Unfortunately I can only do that by staying with V. 9 until the editor controls are hopefully updated sometime in the future.
I really like e-Sword and use it daily, and I appreciate very much all the time and effort that's been invested in it. But it is a bit frustrating when a software update adds new features but at the same time drops the most basic default features of any text editor like drag and drop, hanging bullet formats and multiple indentation.
I haven't seen anything that makes me want to stay with v9.
But I have seen a few things that cause concern. You are right--the control does have bugs and "unpredictable" things do happen. The control has some bugs that are difficult to replicate. But others are easy to replicate. For example, the control will throw an error and produce garbled RTF when you have a certain combination of cells in a table.
Also, the RTF input/output from the control is not always standard RTF. That's concerning for me because what happens if the third party company goes out of business? You then have modules for a control that doesn't exist. You are at their mercy, both in terms of features like drag and drop and whatever else they choose to do or not do. I've noticed far fewer bugs with other file formats, like doc or docx. Is RTF a priority for them?
Also, I'm unimpressed with their technical support and response to bugs (which makes me wonder, are they in business for the long term?). Response to technical support questions (where a 24 hour turn around is promised) is
dismal.