32 replies to this topic

[garydavid711]

ok here is file -would not let me attach file i put in esword says i can not load that type file--if i understand you wanted in .rtf but it looks like tool will take .rtf or .txt

[patchworkid]

Hi gary,

I found your mistake the beginning of each book you have to put the name of the book. example



28:19 Go, therefore, disciple all nations and baptize them in the name [of] the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.

28:20 And teach them to keep all that I commanded you. And behold, I am with you all the days until the end of the world." Amen.

[Mark]
1:1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

1:2 As it is written in Isaiah the prophet: BEHOLD I WILL SEND MY MESSENGER BEFORE YOUR FACE THAT HE MIGHT PREPARE YOUR WAY.

chapter 28 verses 19-20 is part of Matthew, 1:1 is the beginning of Mark so you have to put [Mark] before 1:1, [Luke] next line 1:1 ect.

remember to save it as Bible file[book]/chap:verse--RTF which is the middle one. and change the description, comment, and abbreviation to the name of the bible.

Just a reminder that you can change the color of the special text so you can high light the text.

thanks
Patchworkid

Edited by patchworkid, 21 November 2011 - 05:50 PM.

[BH.]

Well - first glance, you have only have listed the book of Matthew, there is now mark, luke, etc. Oh, the texts may be there, but the program needs to know where to start. You need to have the following format for T3.

÷[MAT]
1:1 the book of geneology...
1:2 Abraham...
1:3 and so on
...
28:19
28:20
[Mark]
1:1
1:2
...
16:19
16:20
[Luke]
1:1
etc.

[garydavid711]

here you go---

[patchworkid]

hi Gary David 711,

here is the file I redone for you [deleted]

but I started to change the wording that is in the brackets [ ] to red but i did not finish.

To finish what i started open the file in Word example copy [and] to find and replace . click on more, then format ​ finally font (font color to Red) - this is for replace. Find or search is auto or black

Let me know if this helps

Thanks

Edited by patchworkid, 26 November 2011 - 05:55 PM.

[garydavid711]

Gary's Peshitta New Testament

After much research and exploring the Dead Sea Scrolls. I now believe The Newer Testament was originally written in Aramaic the scribes penned in the other languages prominently Greek. 1.Knowing that the writers native tongue was Aramaic 2. Many Greek codex have variant readings because of the complexity to translate from Aramaic. 3.The Aramaic clears up many difficult passages. 4. Dave Bauschers New Testament notes is to convincing.

[jonathon]

I now believe The Newer Testament was originally written in Aramaic

Aramaic Primacy has one minor issue: Which books were originally written in Aramaic.

And one trivial issue: It does not provide a rational for the puns in the Greek text, that are not in the Aramaic text.

jonathon

[garydavid711]

I can send you a pdf of Dave Bauscher The Original Aramaic New Testament in Plain English it will answer almost all questions Andrew Roth AENT

[patchworkid]

Hi yes
PM the link to me

thanks

[will brinson: ferguson]

Aramaic Primacy has one minor issue: Which books were originally written in Aramaic.

And one trivial issue: It does not provide a rational for the puns in the Greek text, that are not in the Aramaic text.

jonathon

Yes it is possible that the Western 5 were originally writen in Greek, and that the eastern Assembly thouht of them as not good enough to make their canon, being they were writtin in a heathen tongue, or perhaps just did not think that they were written soon enuff to be canonized. The rest preety much were most more than likely written in either Hebrew or Aramaic though. They has way more word plays/puns that the greek thought of. And if the Greek puns are mostly in the western 5 well then that would tell alot. But we know one thing for sure theoldest Greek Text line up better with the AramaicText, which would show that the newer Greek text kept adding stuff as the years went by. This is why the Greek Text have so many variations. Suprisingly the Aramaic Text kept their newer copies consistant with the Older ones wereby ththe Books they got are not all messed upp like the Greek text have become. I will admitt that the Western 5 belong and should not be discarded as the Eastern Aramaic Assemblies have done, but I would use the other books that they do have to make up the bulk of the NT. Yet there is a great number of people that refuse to see this because they would be forced into admitting that the Heavenly Father' Name is in the NT and is to be used. And that it is not Jehovah at that. Inorance has come a long way, but the Heavenly Father bid all men to repent. Just because we where taught that no one should use His Name is not a good enough reason not to when Scriptures tell us other wise. Plus the Aramaic Text shows that it was only the catholic church that did not want anything to do with worshiping The Heavenly Father as they only but sought to be worshipped themselve, commanded at the penalty of death that all of the Appointed Days of Yahuwah along with His Name had to go in the trash. They also Helenized The Anointed One' Name so that it would have no Hebraic Sound left to it. I do not recomend following after such men' footsteps. The Aramaic Text retain the Sacred Name and thereby is purer than any Greek Text. Oh well there was the oldest Greek Text that used PLACEHOLDERS to let the reader know that this is where you speak the Hebrew Names, but by the third century the catholic leaders had all that removed from their new copies as they did not want any one speaking the true Names. Again I would not encourage anyone to follow after these vial wicked men, that would rathewr kill millions than rather allow them to peacefully worship The Heavenly Father in the manner prescribe by He Himself. So just because some of the Greek has word plays is not good enough to become Helenized all together, for sure. Again the Greek text by the third centry were being revised to suite the purposes of mad men wanting to steal all Yahuwah' Glory for themselves. In the centuries to follow many more of earthly rules (BY SWORDS OF STEAL) continued to add to the Scriptures as they saw fit. The Eastern Aramaic did not do so. The Western Church leaders readily kill anyone for not following them and their changes made to the Scriptures while the Eastern Assembly would readily killed anyone for thinking to change the Scriptures. Is it any wounder why these two did not get along. The Western church wanted to kill all of the Eastern Assemblies for not bowing to them, but could not afford to go there. The cost would be to great so they just hung around and killed the inocent people in their realm. May Yahuwah have mercy on their souls come the Judgement Day. I guess I should say here choose you this day whom you will follow. And I am not just talking of men, I am reffering to Yahuwah Ailoheem or men. Wheat or a Tear?