Posted 18 January 2012 - 03:43 AM
There's not enough ancient languages in any free Bible software. We need Old Church Slavic (outside of Slavonic Bible), Classical Armenian, Classical Georgian, Ethiopic, Old Latin (at least one), Old English portions, Old Saxon fragments, etc. And where's Sahidic Coptic ? That's the standard, not Bohairic.
You know, this is a typical Protestants thing, that they lack any sense of non-fictional history. All these ancient translations are really reverent and strict to their original languages, while the Protestants fill their bible softwares with thousands of fake Bibles which counterfeit the Bible for a thousand non-Christian agendas, like feminism, socialism, and global warming. There's only one real translation in English, the 1582/1610 Real Douay Rheims (the 1752 Fake Douay Rheims is not a bible), and there's only one ancient language un-corrupted by ancient Greek heretics (do any of you even know who the monothelites or the nestorians are?) or the Jews --- Latin, in particular the Clementine Vulgate.
Enough said. We would all benefit from less modern mistranslations and carefuller study of not only early Bible translations, but also early Christian histories and exactly where the many squabbling, disobedient, conflicting, perpetually-splintering Protestant or Orthodox or Ethiopic churches came from and where they're headed. Catholicism is the only 2000 year old Christianity, the only one with Christ's real teaching and continuity with the Early Church Fathers and the Bible when it's accurately translated.
