JFB - Un abridged commentary down for review - Complete & Uploaded

Hi All,

Sorry for the trouble. in few verse references some of the text was mis placed. i have brought down the file to verify one more time. i will correct the errors and re upload again. all the downloaders please accept my apology. please re download the module when it is up again.

thanks

david

Another very minor typo I see is 1:e I think it should be &c.

Jon

Or i.e. ?

this problem might have come as i ran the option of converting roman nos to normal numbers in tooltip.

I have developed (and still tweaking) a MS-Word macro that is a little smarter than T4's roman numeral algorithm. I needed it for some OCR projects where roman numeral verses are used. You want Luke i. 5 converted to Luke 1:5 but not i.e. converted to 1:e. And you want chap iv. converted to chapter 4 not chapter 4: with a colon after it because there is no verse. And you need iv.-x. converted to 4-10 not "4:-x", which is how T4 converts it.

When I get it done, I'll share it, if it's reliable enough

Or i.e. ?

I did wonder if it was i.e. but etc, or the old version of it &c. makes more sense and is what is used here 

http://www.ccel.org/...fb.xi.v.vi.html

Would you agree?

When I get it done, I'll share it, if it's reliable enough

Is your work something BH. could implement into T4?

I did wonder if it was i.e. but etc, or the old version of it &c. makes more sense and is what is used here 

http://www.ccel.org/...fb.xi.v.vi.html

 

Would you agree?

The HTML he was working from had i.e. Probably converted from &c by whoever digitized it. And then T4 made i.e. into 1:e.

Is your work something BH. could implement into T4?

Brent would have to code this himself into T4. He knows about it but is tied up with other things at the moment. 

The HTML he was working from had i.e. Probably converted from &c by whoever digitized it. And then T4 made i.e. into 1:e.

 

David,

A small point I know, but the book has &c. http://archive.org/s...age/n7/mode/2up

&c. is archaic abbreviation of etc. not i.e. http://en.wikipedia....n_abbreviations

Agree? Why repeat someones Oops?

Jon

This commentary has disappeared off the download list - is there a problem with it?