Submitter
Follow @BibleSupportSUPPORT TOPIC File Information
- Submitted: Dec 01 2011 05:36 AM
- Last Updated: Jan 13 2024 06:01 AM
- File Size: 560K
- Views: 3469
- Downloads: 579
- Author: Francis Hodgson
- e-Sword Version: 9.x - 10.x
- Suggest New Tag:: Calvinism, Arminianism, Predestination
Support BibleSupport.com
-
If our e-Sword and MySword modules have blessed you, please consider a small donation.
Your donation pays only for dedicated server hosting, bandwidth, software licenses, and capital equipment (scanners, OCR equipment, etc).
Other Modules By Same Author
- No modules found
e-Sword 9+ Module Download:
Download
Hodgson, Francis - Calvinistic Doctrine of Predestination Refuted 1.0
4 Votes
Calvinism Arminian Soteriology (Salvation)
0
Author:
Francis Hodgson
e-Sword Version:
9.x - 10.x
Suggest New Tag::
Calvinism, Arminianism, Predestination
This is basically a three chapter work (each chapter is a fairly long one) describing the problems of Calvinism's teaching of Predestination from an admittedly Arminian position.
While I am neither Calvinistic nor Arminian, I found this work to be helpful and interesting.
What's New in Version 1.0 (See full changelog)
- Uploaded Mac/e-sword 11 version.
Other files you may be interested in ..
- 8,237 Total Files
- 50 Total Categories
- 273 Total Contributors
- 5,870,942 Total Downloads
- The Alpha & Omega Bible Latest File
- iSawTheLightMinistries Latest Submitter
45 user(s) are online (in the past 30 minutes)
3 members, 36 guests, 0 anonymous users
JEchevarria , DitoSundayTeacher , Facebook (6), Steven 6583
This is another resource which will help in understanding the problems encountered with Calvin's theology. I believe this piece of work sits really well along side with:
Where Calkins and Bryson deals with the whole of the teaching of Calvin's TULIP doctrine, Hodgson seems to focus primarily on the Calvinists understanding of Predestination. If one is to clearly understand the Calvinist's view of Salvation, then one cannot focus on one aspect of it, namely Predestination. One must take into consideration the whole oft he TULIP doctrine, because if one part of it falls, then the whole of TULIP falls, or if one part of it stands, then the whole of TULIP stands.
Aside from this tad of a problem, I think this work is worth the read. I give it 3 stars.
Blessings,
Stephen (Php 1:21).